Marvin Bernardo Spiering vs Alexis Gurmendi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L W L L
Form
L W W W L L L W W LHead-To-Head: Spiering 1 - 0 Gurmendi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Spiering winning 2 and Gurmendi winning 0. The last match between Spiering and Gurmendi was at the Argentina F1 (Villa del Dique), 05-06-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Marvin Bernardo Spiering getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marvin Bernardo Spiering | 1 |
| Alexis Gurmendi | 0 |
Argentina F1 (Villa del Dique)(05-06-2017)
| Spiering | Stats | Gurmendi |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (2-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 27 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (35-25) | Career Total W/L | 54% (20-17) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marvin Bernardo Spiering Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Ryan Augusto dos Santos
Player
Marvin Bernardo Spiering
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
Marvin Bernardo Spiering
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Alexis Gurmendi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Alexis Gurmendi
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 7-5 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Satterfield
Player
Alexis Gurmendi
49%
(
48 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Alexis Gurmendi
49%
(
45 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Florez
Player
Alexis Gurmendi
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (35/25) | Win/Loss | 54% (20/17) |
| 58% (76/56) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (43/42) |
| 55% (634/528) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (394/383) |
| 70% (7/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (26/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (20/17) |
| 67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 18 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 43 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 289.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 180.7 |
| 65% (531/813) | 1st Serve % | 62% (244/392) |
| 59% (315/531) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (135/244) |
| 48% (136/282) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (75/148) |
| 41% (30/74) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (13/30) |
| 38% (330/865) | Return Points Win % | 37% (140/379) |
| 20% (1/4) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 62% (34/21) | Futures W/L | 56% (20/16) |
| 58% (35/60) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 27% (3/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 50% (6/12) | Deciding Set Win % | 73% (8/11) |
| 91% (35/32) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (17/16) |
| 9% (35/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (17/1) |
| 12% (25/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (20/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
